🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for additional consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable debates in additional member states